SCOTUS REVIEW
Independent Review of
United States Supreme Court Decisions
& Analysis of Constitutional Principles
Checking the Court's Work. One Case at a Time.
SCOTUS Review examines Supreme Court decisions through forensic documentation. Every claim we make is tied to a source document, published alongside our analysis so you can verify it yourself.
The Court has stated its own standard. "As in every case, our single duty is to determine the issues presented in accord with the Constitution and the law." Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 445 (1971). Our work examines whether the Court is fulfilling that duty — or something else entirely. The record answers. Case by case, our reviews show how outcomes are actually reached. Facts restated until they fit. Holdings stretched or narrowed to serve a result. And through it all, the Constitution's text and structure quietly abandoned — at times far enough to produce the very forms of government it was written to prevent.
Our mission is empowerment: to expose the truth, recover not just the text of the Constitution but the spirit behind it, and equip you to learn the law and its principles for yourself. The sources are in front of you. Judge for yourself.
Recent Case Reviews
(Coming Soon)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923)
Our Decision: Coming Soon
(Coming Soon)
Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)
Our Decision: Coming Soon
(Coming Soon)
Coming Soon.
Our Decision: Coming Soon
Featured Analysis
Featured Article
The True Nature of Subject Matter Jurisdiction vs. a Century-Old Lie
This analysis explains how, under the Constitution, judges get and lose their power and how the true nature of subject has been hidden from the american people to shield judges and other officials from accountability
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
— James Madison, Federalist No. 47
Case Reviews
(Coming Soon)
Pung v. Isabella County
Our Decision: Vacated. The tax was never owed. No court — including this one — ever checked.
(Coming Soon)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923)
Our Decision: Coming Soon
(Coming Soon)
Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)
Our Decision: Coming Soon
(Coming Soon)
Coming Soon.
Our Decision: Coming Soon
(Coming Soon)
Coming Soon.
Our Decision: Coming Soon
(Coming Soon)
Coming Soon.
Our Decision: Coming Soon
More coming soon...
Analysis Articles
The True Nature of Subject Matter Jurisdiction vs. a Century-Old Lie
(Coming Soon)
What is Structural Non-Adjudication?
(Coming Soon)
Judicial Immunity– a Century Old Lie
(Coming Soon)
The Destruction of Common Law Courts
(Coming Soon)
The Rise of Hypothetical and Presumptive Injury– Adjudicating a Fairytale
(Coming Soon)
The Most Fundamental Question: By What Authority?
(Coming Soon)
More coming soon...
Contact
Subscribe to receive updates
Send a message